Write a research paper outlining the three primary categories of ethics.

Write a research paper outlining the three primary categories of ethics.Spring 2024
Prompt: The first graded assignment is to read A different mirror: A history of multicultural America. Part One: Foundations. (Takaki, 1993, pp. 75-130). As such, you will write a four-page double spaced paper (Times New Roman, 12 pt. font) explaining to your reading audience the author’s main argument. You will identify strengths and weaknesses of the argument and explain why you agree or disagree. You may look in the data bases for articles that support your position. Remember to cite in APA style writing throughout your paper and create a References section at the end (not a Works Cited). Purdue Owl or Google is your best friend for creating an acceptable document in APA format. Another great idea is to find a scholarly social science peer reviewed article or paper and pattern your work after that. Using the format is not plagiarism. Using someone else’s work and not citing is plagiarism. We will go over the assignment requirements in depth, so no worries.
The book (A Different Mirror) is an easy read and on point. I will lecture on Part One via Zoom. I may assign groups to lecture on the rest of the book throughout the semester. Each group member will take a portion of the assigned reading as their contribution. It is up to the groups to decide who does what parts.

Learning Objectives
Students will learn to conduct a literature review and produce a writing reflection in APA style format. As such, students will learn to cite properly in the body of their work and create a correct Reference section. We will not explore other aspects of APA in this class. Students will also learn about societies and their interactions through a Takaki (1993) lens. This mean chapters will be assigned for reading and response usually bimonthly using the instructor prompt as a guideline.
Read the assignment. Be aware of anything that appears to be unclear, unanswered, or ambiguous. Content that is not clear and specific based on evidence may lead to a research question. Identify the author’s main argument. Look for strengths and weakness in the author’s argument. Do some research…look in the library data base, i..e. Jstor (means journal storage), and enter key words from the reading in the Jstor search engine. Journal articles are optional. Therefore, should you decide to choose an article that may appear to be on point, use that arguments to either refute or support Takaki’s argument. All supporting evidence should be peer reviewed and published in a credible source to be considered reliable. In your own words tell you reading audience the author’s main argument and remember to cite. Submit your work in the assignments section of this program on or before the due date

Assignment 3
For the second assignment read pages 75 – 130 and tell your reading audience what the author is saying and what the author’s main arguments are. The assignment is exactly the same as assignment one but this time you will be held to a higher standard.
Various videos may be assigned throughout the semester. The following short YouTube videos are recommended:
APA in-text citation made easy (David Taylor);
APA in-text citation, 6th Edition (M.A. Scott);
APA Reference page (Raechel Soicher).

Last Completed Projects