Purpose
This assignment is intended evaluate your ability to create a comprehensive plan for improving the quality of selected HR management practices within your area of influence.
Overview
In this assignment, you’ll review the work you’ve done and apply your new understandings to create a comprehensive plan to improve the quality of selected HRM practices in your area of influence.
When you submit your work, it will be submitted to Turnitin and checked for potential plagiarism. Make sure to submit your work early enough to allow you time to make any necessary revisions. For more information, read Turnitin and CanvasLinks to an external site.. You can also consult the APA Citation StyleLinks to an external site. guide to ensure that you are referencing and formatting your paper properly.
Action Items
Review the rubric for this assignment.
Review the attached HR Metrics Template Download HR Metrics Templateand all of your research, class notes, and the feedback you received from your professor on the business brief assignments.
Write a 2,000 to 3,000-word APA-formatted paper that follows the Comprehensive Plan Guidelines Download Comprehensive Plan Guidelines.
Check your writing style by using GrammarlyLinks to an external site. (you can create a free account using your Franklin email address).
Submit your assignment. Your work will automatically be checked by Turnitin.
Review your Submission Details and access your Turnitin report. Revise your work as needed based on the feedback.
By the due date indicated, re-submit the final version of your work.
Rubric
Comprehensive Plan
Comprehensive Plan
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExecutive Summary
15 to >13.0 pts
Accurately, clearly, and succinctly addressed all required elements.
13 to >12.0 pts
Accurately addressed all required elements. Clear and succinct, with few exceptions.
12 to >0 pts
Did not accurately address all required elements. Unclear and either incomplete or too wordy.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe Organization
10 to >9.0 pts
Thoroughly described the organization, including its relevant history, what it does, and who its customers are.
9 to >8.0 pts
Described the organization, including its relevant history, what it does, and who its customers are. Minor errors or omissions.
8 to >0 pts
Did not describe the organization, including its relevant history, what it does, and who its customers are. Major or numerous errors or omissions.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeChallenges and Opportunities
10 to >9.0 pts
Thoroughly described the challenges and/or opportunities the organization faces.
9 to >8.0 pts
Described the challenges and/or opportunities the organization faces. Minor errors or omissions.
8 to >0 pts
Did not describe the challenges and/or opportunities the organization faces. Major or numerous errors or omissions.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCurrent Practices
10 to >9.0 pts
Thoroughly described some of the organization’s current HRM practices in regard to its employees.
9 to >8.0 pts
Described some of the organization’s current HRM practices in regard to its employees. Minor errors or omissions.
8 to >0 pts
Did not describe some of the organization’s current HRM practices in regard to its employees. Major or numerous errors or omissions.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKey Results
15 to >13.0 pts
Accurately identified at least 6 key result areas for the organization. Included a table that illustrated the areas, including targets, current results, and accurately computed difference. Logically explained how improving these areas will enhance the organization’s competitive advantage.
13 to >12.0 pts
Accurately identified at least 6 key result areas for the organization. Included a table illustrating the areas, including targets, current results, and accurately computed difference. Logically explained how improving these areas will enhance the organization’s competitive advantage. Minor errors or omissions.
12 to >0 pts
Did not accurately identify at least 6 key result areas for the organization. Did not included a table that illustrated the areas, or table did not include targets, current results, and accurately computed difference. Did not explain how improving these areas will enhance the organization’s competitive advantage or explanation was vague, illogical. Major or numerous errors or omissions.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEffectiveness of Current Practices
10 to >9.0 pts
Logically analyzed the effectiveness of the organization’s current practices. Thoroughly explained and logically justified conclusions.
9 to >8.0 pts
Logically analyzed the effectiveness of the organization’s current practices. Explained and logically justified conclusions. Minor errors or omissions.
8 to >0 pts
Did not analyze the effectiveness of the organization’s current practices or analysis was illogical. Did not explain and justify conclusions or explanation was vague, illogical. Major or numerous errors or omissions.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations
15 to >13.0 pts
Thoroughly described specific major strategies recommended to improve the quality of selected HR management practices within area of influence. Demonstrated a thorough understanding of HR best practices.
13 to >12.0 pts
Described specific major strategies recommended to improve the quality of selected HR management practices within area of influence. Demonstrated an adequate understanding of HR best practices. Minor errors or omissions.
12 to >0 pts
Did not describe major strategies recommended to improve the quality of selected HR management practices within area of influence or recommendations were vague, non-specific. Demonstrated an inadequate understanding of HR best practices. Major or numerous errors or omissions.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImpact
10 to >9.0 pts
Thoroughly and logically described the value or impact improvements will have in driving business success.
9 to >8.0 pts
Logically described the value or impact improvements will have in driving business success. Minor errors or omissions.
8 to >0 pts
Did not describe the value or impact improvements will have in driving business success. Major or numerous errors or omissions.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMeasuring and Reporting
10 to >9.0 pts
Thoroughly and logically described how success of the plan will be measured and reported.
9 to >8.0 pts
Logically described how success of the plan will be measured and reported. Minor errors or omissions.
8 to >0 pts
Did not logically describe how success of the plan will be measured and reported. Major or numerous errors or omissions.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences
8 to >7.0 pts
Included at least seven authoritative sources. At least three of these were scholarly.
7 to >6.0 pts
Included at least seven authoritative sources. At least three of these were scholarly. Minor errors in source selection.
6 to >0 pts
Did not include at least seven authoritative sources. Did not meet the requirement that at least three of the seven resources must be scholarly. Major errors in source selection.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
15 to >13.0 pts
Effectively synthesized information. Moved smoothly and logically from one idea to the next. Accurately followed Comprehensive Plan Guidelines.
13 to >12.0 pts
Effectively synthesized information. Moved logically from one idea to the next. Accurately followed Comprehensive Plan Guidelines. Minor errors or omissions.
12 to >0 pts
Little or no synthesis of information. Hard to follow; ideas not presented logically. Accurately followed Comprehensive Plan Guidelines. Major or numerous errors or omissions.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
12 to >11.0 pts
Spelling, punctuation, grammar and APA format are correct throughout.
11 to >10.0 pts
Spelling, punctuation, grammar and APA format are correct with minor exceptions.
10 to >0 pts
Numerous spelling, punctuation, grammar, and APA format errors.
12 pts
Total Points: 140
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|